Sri Lanka's Migrant Workers: The Unacknowledged Pillars of the Economy

The economic crisis that has gripped Sri Lanka has brought to light the invaluable contribution of its migrant workers and expats living overseas. When the government struggled to provide essential necessities during these challenging times, it was the remittances from these individuals that acted as a crucial safety net, preventing the island from facing an even more dire fate.

According to data from the International Labour Organisation (ILO), remittances contribute around 8% to Sri Lanka's GDP, averaging $7 billion per year. This financial lifeline has become increasingly vital, especially in recent years. The Central Bank reports a substantial increase of 74.4% in remittances as of August this year compared to the same period last year, reaching $3,862.7 million.

The economic downturn prompted over a million Sri Lankans to seek opportunities abroad, with 311,269 leaving the country for foreign employment in 2022 alone. Unfortunately, a significant portion of these migrants faces challenges, including exploitation by the notorious "job agency mafia." Reports of mistreatment, lack of coordination, and gross negligence have become all too common.

It is disheartening to note that the state sector, despite its size, inefficiency, and corruption, has failed to fulfill its duty toward these hard-working migrant workers. The promises of a welfare safety net remain unfulfilled, highlighting a significant gap in support and protection for those who contribute so significantly to the country's economy.

Minister of Labour and Foreign Employment, Manusha Nanayakkara, recently revealed the government's struggle to implement measures intended for the welfare of migrant workers. Despite decisions being made over a year ago, obstacles within state agencies, including the Customs and the Central Bank, have hindered the execution of approved relief measures. The failure to implement a duty relief increase for migrant workers at airports, despite the President's gazette, reflects a lack of commitment from key stakeholders.

This state of affairs raises questions about the gratitude and cultural values often associated with Sri Lankans. The very officials benefiting from the dollars earned through the hard work of migrant workers seem to overlook their responsibility to enact relief measures. The public sector's failure to deliver on promises and provide assistance to those in need only serves to diminish public trust.

In conclusion, it is imperative that the Sri Lankan government and state agencies promptly address the welfare concerns of migrant workers. Acknowledging their pivotal role in the economy is not enough; tangible actions must be taken to ensure their well-being and protection, fulfilling the promises made over a year ago. The lack of implementation is not just a bureaucratic failure; it is a disheartening betrayal of the hard-working individuals who continue to be the backbone of Sri Lanka's economic resilience.